What actually happens?
You upload a pleading, and then you argue.
Twenty minutes, out loud, against an opponent that interrupts and a bench that rules before you are allowed to continue. Here is the whole loop.
Before you speak
Two bodies of knowledge, kept apart on purpose
You upload the pleading. LexGrit reads it and holds the facts of your case, taken from that document, separately from the procedural rules of your forum, held verbatim. A case-specific fact and a generally applicable rule are different kinds of thing, and an argument that confuses them is the kind of argument that loses.
You can also write down what you must not fail to say. Elements of the claim. The controlling authority. The counterargument you keep avoiding.
While you argue
You speak. Opposing counsel listens for a reason to object.
The moment something objectionable leaves your mouth, one of three things happens — in descending order of speed.
No model in the loop
A clear objection fires immediately
Leading, hearsay — recognised by pattern, with no latency to hear.
Weighed against the record
An ambiguous one goes to judgement
A model weighs it against what is actually on the record in this session.
Most of the time
Nothing fires, because nothing should
The room is not trying to catch you out; it is trying to be a courtroom.
Objections are proceeding-aware. Nobody objects "hearsay" at an oral argument, because there is no witness to have heard anything. The room knows which grounds exist in the proceeding you chose.
Then the bench rules
Sustained or overruled, aloud, before you continue.
You argue on from the ruling, exactly as you would have to.
Nothing reaches your ears unverified
Every sentence the room is about to speak is checked first against the record for contradictions, and against reality for fabricated citations. A hallucinated case name is worse than useless in a rehearsal tool: it teaches you to cite something that does not exist.
After
A scorecard, and a record you can walk back through.
The transcript
With every objection and ruling marked in place.
Which must-hit points you actually hit
Each with the line where you hit it — and the ones you missed, which is the part worth reading.
How you delivered it
Pace, filler density, and how long it took you to recover a coherent line after being interrupted. That last number is the one that changes with practice.
A counterfactual on any moment
The stronger line you could have taken, grounded in your own pleading rather than invented.
And if ninety seconds of it went badly, you can re-enter the session at that moment and argue those ninety seconds again — rather than spending a fresh twenty minutes to fix them.
What is never kept
No session audio is stored. Ever.
Your voice arguing your client's case is work product. The delivery figures are computed while you speak and only the numbers are kept — which is all they were ever for.