After a session

The scorecard

The overall score, the judge’s grade across the dimensions it weighs, colored strengths and weaknesses, and the verbatim written ruling. The scores exist to compare your own rehearsals against each other — they are not calibrated against human judges yet, and LexGrit says so wherever they appear rather than letting a number look like more than it is.

Must-hit coverage

The part worth reading first: which of your checklist points the argument actually addressed — each hit backed by the line where you hit it — and which it missed. A missed point with your own transcript beside it is the most actionable sentence the debrief produces.

The replay

The session replayed in order: every turn, objection, and ruling, time-aligned. No audio — none was recorded — and the replay says so in words rather than showing a player that does not work. From any exchange, re-argue from here opens a new session that resumes at that moment, so a ruling you fumbled becomes a drill instead of a regret. You can also ask what opposing counsel would have done had you argued the line differently.

Delivery

The mechanics of how you spoke, from measurements taken during the session: pace, filler words, how long you took to recover after an objection, and what never got resolved. Figures that could not be measured are reported as unmeasured — never estimated.

The practice record

The auditable account of the rehearsal, written the way a credentialing body would need it: verifiable attendance as measured speaking time (not how long a tab was open), duration, the difficulty actually applied, preparation coverage, and that an assessment was performed and on which criteria. Download as text exports it as a plain document that survives being pasted into a filing.

It deliberately carries no score — an uncalibrated figure has no business in a document a board might read — and the record states that on itself, so the omission travels with the document.

Teach the court

When a ruling cites a provision your forum applies differently, record the correction right where you noticed it. It joins your forum’s overlay, outranks the base rules at retrieval, and is quoted back with provenance in later sessions — labelled as counsel’s own note, never passed off as authority. This is how your court stops being a generic one.